§
Maramont Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  4. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 301 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  5. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  6. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Albany Steel, Inc.

    17 F.3d 564 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 503, 266, Docket 93-4055, 93-4071. Argued October 6, 1993. Decided February 24, 1994. Nancy J. Gottfried, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Paul J. Speilberg, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Jerry M. Hunter, General Counsel, Yvonne T. Dixon, Acting Deputy General Counsel, Nicholas E. Karatinos, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner/cross-respondent. Mary

  8. Dist. 65, Distrib. Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    593 F.2d 1155 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 77-1239, 77-1367. Argued May 4, 1978. Decided September 26, 1978. Andrew Tranovich, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner in No. 77-1367 and respondent in No. 77-1239. Lewis M. Steel, New York City, with whom Eugene G. Eisner