§

Mar-Jam Supply Co.

337 N.L.R.B. 337 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Mar-Jam Supply Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  4. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

  7. Electromation, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    35 F.3d 1148 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding finding of domination in similar situation

  8. Burger King Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1053 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that the challenged policy must be enforced in a “consistent and nondiscriminatory fashion”

  9. Midstate Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    706 F.2d 401 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 10 times
    Applying special circumstances approach to rule banning a particular type of T-shirt

  10. N.L.R.B. v. San Antonio Portland Cement Co.

    611 F.2d 1148 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 7 times
    Wearing of union buttons is permissible statement of personal preference

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  12. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions