§

Manor Healthcare Corp.

285 N.L.R.B. 224 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Manor Healthcare Corp.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Hendry Corp. v. United States Fidelity

    393 U.S. 978 (1968)   Cited 63 times

    No. 537. December 9, 1968, OCTOBER TERM, 1968. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Stanley W. Rosenkranz and Charles W. Pittman for petitioner. E. Dixie Beggs for respondent. Reported below: 391 F. 2d 13.

  2. Sheraton-Kauai Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    429 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 39 times
    Holding that whether new employees constitute an accretion to an existing unit cannot be stipulated by contract

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Sun Drug Co.

    359 F.2d 408 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 45 times
    Denying a request for an evidentiary hearing on the issue "whether there was a substantial and material question of fact" because "[t]his is a question of law"

  4. Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    653 F.2d 450 (10th Cir. 1981)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Board had acted contrary to Rule 301 by using a Board-created presumption to shift the burden of persuasion, rather than the burden of production

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Western and Southern Life Ins. Co.

    391 F.2d 119 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 26 times

    No. 16621. Argued October 3, 1967. Decided March 4, 1968. Warren M. Davison, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda Sher, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. John G. Wayman, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa. (W.D. Armour, Pittsburgh, Pa., Ithamar D. Weed, Cincinatti, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and MARIS and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges

  6. Beth Israel Hosp. Geriatric Cen. v. NLRB

    688 F.2d 697 (10th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    In Beth Israel, we reaffirmed three panel decisions which denied enforcement to Board determinations of bargaining units, and we addressed only the language in each panel opinion stating that the Board, when certifying bargaining units in the health care field, could not employ a presumption that shifts the burden of persuasion to the employer.

  7. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    685 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 1297, 1442, Dockets 82-4081, 82-4091. Argued June 10, 1982. Decided July 21, 1982. Ronald H. Shechtman, New York City (Gordon Schechtman, Richard M. Betheil, New York City, of counsel), for intervenor-respondent. Robert M. Kaufman, New York City (Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, Richard H. Block, New York City, of counsel), for Hospital Ass'n of New York State, amicus curiae. Patricia S. Hofstra, Chicago, Ill., for American Hospital Ass'n, amicus curiae. David H. Diamond, New York City (Guggenheimer

  8. Big Y Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    651 F.2d 40 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 11 times
    Reviewing manner in which Board made appropriateness determination where there was no dispute over whether Board was required to make such a determination

  9. Banco Credito y Ahorro Ponceno v. N.L.R.B

    390 F.2d 110 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times

    No. 7001. March 7, 1968. William Lespier and Miguel Palou Sabater, Hato Rey, P.R., with whom Cohen Lespier, Hato Rey, P.R., was on brief, for petitioner. Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman and Leon M. Kestenbaum, Washington, D.C., Attorneys, were on brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The petitioner

  10. Magic Pan, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    627 F.2d 105 (7th Cir. 1980)   Cited 11 times
    Mentioning NLRB's use of presumption and not disapproving

  11. Section 183 - Conciliation of labor disputes in the health care industry

    29 U.S.C. § 183   Cited 14 times

    (a) Establishment of Boards of Inquiry; membership If, in the opinion of the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, a threatened or actual strike or lockout affecting a health care institution will, if permitted to occur or to continue, substantially interrupt the delivery of health care in the locality concerned, the Director may further assist in the resolution of the impasse by establishing within 30 days after the notice to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service under