Manitowoc Ice, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  2. Three J Farms, Inc. v. Plaintiffs' Steering Comm

    456 U.S. 936 (1982)   Cited 89 times
    Denying certiorari of Fifth Circuit ruling in In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 659 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir. Unit A Oct. 1981) where injunction was upheld under "in aid of jurisdiction" exception and relitigation exception in an in personam case
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
  4. Honeywell Intern., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    253 F.3d 125 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 12 times
    Concluding that the following duration clause did not waive the union's rights: “The Effects Bargaining Agreement shall be effective as of May 30, 1994, and shall remain in effect until midnight on June 6, 1997, but not thereafter unless renewed or extended in writing by the parties”
  5. Timken Roller Bearing Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 56 times
    In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F.2d 746 (6th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964), the court considered a union request for information concerning five grievances that awaited hearings before a chosen arbitrator.
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Rockwell-Standard, Trans. Axle

    410 F.2d 953 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 44 times

    No. 18651. May 29, 1969. Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Neal J. Conway, Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief. Leonard L. Scheinholtz, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent, Jonathan L. Alder, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief. Before PHILLIPS, EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges. Judge Edwards took no part in the consideration of decision of this case

  7. Leeds Northrup Company v. N.L.R.B

    391 F.2d 874 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 31 times
    In Leeds Northrup Co. v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 874 (3rd Cir. 1968), the Third Circuit enforced the Board's order requiring the company to grant backpay to union employees based on a prior compensation formula where the company had unilaterally altered the formula in violation of its duty to bargain.
  8. Exxon Research Engineering Co. v. N.L.R.B

    89 F.3d 228 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-60358. July 16, 1996. Stephen W. Smith, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, TX, for respondents. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Peter David Winkler, Julie Brock Broido, National labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Michael Dunn, Director, National Labor Relations Board, Fort Worth, TX, for NLRB. Howard Shapiro, McCalla, Thompson, Pyburn, Hymowitz Shapiro, New Orleans, LA, for The Thrift Plan of Exxon Corporation, A Part of the Benefit Plan of Exxon Corporation and participating

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pepsi-Cola Distributing Co. of Tennessee, Inc.

    646 F.2d 1173 (6th Cir. 1981)   Cited 7 times

    No. 79-1314. Argued February 2, 1981. Decided May 1, 1981. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John Ferguson, Joseph Norelli, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Curtis L. Mack, Director, Region 10, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. J. W. Alexander, Jr., Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BATTISTI, District Judge. Honorable Frank J. Battisti, Chief Judge, United

  10. General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 918 (4th Cir. 1969)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that employer committed an unfair labor practice by failing to disclose results of survey of wages paid by other employers in the area in response to request by union