11 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.
343 U.S. 395 (1952) Cited 269 timesHolding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG
205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953) Cited 118 timesIn Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
N.L.R.B. v. Royal Plating Polishing Co.
350 F.2d 191 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 43 timesIn NLRB v. Royal Plating Polishing Co., Inc., 350 F.2d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1965), the court characterized a company's decision to close a plant when "faced with the economic necessity of either moving or consolidating the operations of a failing business" as a "management decision which [is] fundamental to the basic direction of a corporate enterprise" and which lies "at the core of entrepreneurial control.
N.L.R.B. v. Transmarine Navigation Corporation
380 F.2d 933 (9th Cir. 1967) Cited 28 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Transmarine Navigation Corp., 380 F.2d 933 (9th Cir. 1967), the Ninth Circuit was asked to enforce a Board order.
N.L.R.B. v. Thompson Transport Company
406 F.2d 698 (10th Cir. 1969) Cited 24 timesNo. 9879. January 29, 1969. Rehearing Denied March 21, 1969. Edward Wall, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Frank H. Itkin and Mitchell L. Strickler, Washington, D.C., Attorneys, on the brief), for petitioner. William G. Haynes, Topeka, Kan. (Lillard, Eidson, Lewis Porter and O.B. Eidson, Philip H. Lewis, James W. Porter, Charles S. Fisher, Jr., Charles N. Henson, Peter F. Caldwell, Roscoe
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Shoes
208 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1953) Cited 29 timesDeciding that the employerengaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8 where the record contained evidence of “[l]ong delays unaccounted for in the matter of correspondence and the preparation of documents, the postponement of meetings of the negotiators for weeks at a time, and the reopening of questions previously settled”
N.L.R.B. v. Gallaro
419 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 4 timesNo. 111, Docket 33512. Argued October 17, 1969. Decided December 8, 1969. Baruch A. Fellner, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold M. Weston, New York City (Eli Mellan, Bronstein, Miller Mellan, Mineola, N.Y., on the brief), for respondents. Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. ANDERSON, Circuit
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Clay Mines
219 F.2d 120 (6th Cir. 1955) Cited 17 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. United Clay Mines Corp., 6 Cir., 219 F.2d 120, 125 in reversing a N.L.R.B. finding that the employer was guilty of unfair labor practices by refusing to bargain in good faith, the court held that lack of good faith could be shown only by conduct "clearly showing an intent not to enter into a contract".
Fruit Vegetable Packers v. N.L.R.B
316 F.2d 389 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 9 timesNo. 16959. Argued December 17, 1962. Decided February 28, 1963. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Miss Vivian Asplund, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost
International Un., U.A., Air. Ag. v. Textron
359 F.2d 966 (6th Cir. 1966) Cited 3 timesInterpreting conflicting language within the CBA over the termination of pension benefits where both sides indicated an intent to terminate the agreement