§

Manhattan Day School

346 N.L.R.B. 992 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Manhattan Day School

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech

    134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election

  5. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    127 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-3688. November 13, 1997. Michael T. Manley, Blake Uhlig, P.A., Kansas City, KS, for IBB. Dion Kohler, C. Thomas Davis, Lee Stanford Sherrill, Atlanta, GA, for H. B. Zachry Co. Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. General Counsel, Nancy B. Hunt, Margaret G. Neigus, Frederick C. Havard, Jill A. Griffin, NLRB, Washington, DC, for NLRB. Petition for Review and Cross Petition for Review of the National Labor Relations Board. (Agency Nos. 12-CA-14962, 12-CA-14962-2 12-CA-15018) Before CARNES, Circuit

  6. Rock-Tenn Company v. N.L.R.B

    101 F.3d 1441 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 5 times
    Concluding bargaining was mandatory because shift of unit work to subcontract hauling company to save on labor costs "is a prototype Fibreboard case"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Waymouth Farms, Inc.

    172 F.3d 598 (8th Cir. 1999)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming NLRB order finding violation of section 8 when employer made misrepresentations with respect to relocation of business that affected negotiation of the effects of relocation