§

Manhattan Center Studios, Inc.

357 N.L.R.B. 1677 (N.L.R.B. 2011)
Manhattan Center Studios, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 259 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  2. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Jacob E. Decker and Sons

    569 F.2d 357 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that "new evidence" discovered after trial does not warrant a new trial when its only purpose would be to impeach a witness

  4. Manhattan Center Studios, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    452 F.3d 813 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 04-1400, 04-1417. Argued November 8, 2005. Decided June 23, 2006. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Peter D. Stergios argued the cause for the petitioner/cross-respondent. Patrick M. Collins was on brief. Stacy G. Zimmerman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent/cross-applicant. Arthur F. Rosenfeld, Acting General Counsel, Margery E. Lieber, Acting Assistant General Counsel,

  5. City of Charlottesville, Va. v. F.E.R.C

    774 F.2d 1205 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that once the case was remanded because the government failed to consider a relevant factor, the government did not "exceed the scope of the remand by reaffirming its decision on different grounds" after it had considered the relevant factor in question