§

Manhattan Beer Distributors LLC

362 NLRB No. 192 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
Manhattan Beer Distributors LLC

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  4. Garment Workers v. Quality Mfg. Co.

    420 U.S. 276 (1975)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that because the employer “failed to file a petition for reconsideration as permitted by Board Rules and Regulations,” the employer could not assert its objection on appeal

  5. Kraslawsky v. Upper Deck Co.

    56 Cal.App.4th 179 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Kraslawsky, the court reversed summary judgment on state constitutional privacy and wrongful termination claims after concluding a triable issue of material fact existed regarding whether the employer had reasonable cause to believe the employee was under the influence of intoxicants.

  6. Reeves v. Singleton

    994 S.W.2d 586 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 3 times

    No. WD 56260 Filed: May 18, 1999 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY THE HONORABLE BYRON L. KINDER, J. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Hugh L. Marshall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for Appellant. John L. Patton, Columbia, for Respondent. Before Presiding Judge Laura Denvir Stith, Judge Harold L. Lowenstein, and Judge Albert A. Riederer LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge. Appellant, Stephen Reeves, the Superintendent and Appointing Authority of Fulton State Hospital (the Hospital)

  7. Super Valu Xenia v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    627 F.2d 13 (6th Cir. 1980)   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 78-1358. August 13, 1980. Edward B. Mitchell, Brian K. Porter, Daniel G. Rosenthal, Smith Schnacke, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Allison Brown, Jr., Deputy Associate Gen. Counsels, Barbara G. Gehring, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Emil C. Farkas, Director, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CELEBREZZE and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. ORDER This case is before the court on petition of

  8. Section 382.307 - Reasonable suspicion testing

    49 C.F.R. § 382.307   Cited 7 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) An employer shall require a driver to submit to an alcohol test when the employer has reasonable suspicion to believe that the driver has violated the prohibitions of subpart B of this part concerning alcohol. The employer's determination that reasonable suspicion exists to require the driver to undergo an alcohol test must be based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or body odors of the driver. (b) An employer shall require a driver