Malinda F.,1 Complainant, v. Barbara M. Barrett, Secretary, Department of the Air Force (National Guard Bureau), Agency.

24 Cited authorities

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,895 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital

    488 U.S. 204 (1988)   Cited 1,743 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts will not defer to an agency's litigating position where it contradicts the agency's prior “regulations, rulings, or administrative practice”
  3. Feres v. United States

    340 U.S. 135 (1950)   Cited 1,463 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Government is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service"
  4. Overton v. New York State Div. of Military

    373 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 313 times
    Holding Feres barred Title VII suit that "would likely intrude into" the plaintiff's "nominally civilian, yet distinctly military, relationship" with his superior
  5. Walch v. Adjutant Gen.'s Dep't of Tex.

    533 F.3d 289 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 231 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court could consider exhibits attached to the plaintiff's opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss because "[n]o party questions the authenticity of these two documents and both were sufficiently referenced in the complaint"
  6. Zuress v. Donley

    606 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 28 times
    Noting that Feres doctrine applies "whenever a legal action would require a civilian court to examine decisions regarding management, discipline, supervision, and control of members of the armed forces of the United States" and affirming that Feres doctrine precluded dual status military and civilian employee's Title VII claims
  7. Jentoft v. U.S.

    450 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2006)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the 1997 Amendments allowed a dual status National Guard technician to bring an Equal Pay Act claim against the military
  8. Johnson v. Alexander

    572 F.2d 1219 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that an applicant for enlistment in the United States Army could not sue Army officials for denying his enlistment
  9. Wetherill v. Geren

    616 F.3d 789 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 11 times

    No. 09-3334. Submitted: June 17, 2010. Filed: August 11, 2010. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Karen E. Schreier, J. Sarah E. Baron Houy, argued, Rapid City, SD, for appellant. Robert Bruce Anderson, argued, Pierre, SD, for Appellees Doohen, Johnson, and The SD Army National Guard. Daneta Wollmann, AUSA, argued, Rapid City, SD, for Appellees Geren and The Army National Guard. Before WOLLMAN, EBEL and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. The Honorable David M. Ebel

  10. Willis v. Roche

    256 F. App'x 534 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that the ART challenged conduct by an officer supervising him in both his military and civilian capacities
  11. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 5,062 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"
  12. Section 7513 - Cause and procedure

    5 U.S.C. § 7513   Cited 652 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the MSPB may hear appeals involving removals, suspensions for more than 14 days, reductions in grade or pay, and furloughs of 30 days or less
  13. Section 7512 - Actions covered

    5 U.S.C. § 7512   Cited 603 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Covering "a removal"
  14. Section 7511 - Definitions; application

    5 U.S.C. § 7511   Cited 485 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining "employee"
  15. Section 709 - Technicians: employment, use, status

    32 U.S.C. § 709   Cited 234 times
    Providing that dual status technicians must be members of the National Guard, hold a specified military grade, and wear the appropriate uniform
  16. Section 10216 - Military technicians (dual status)

    10 U.S.C. § 10216   Cited 57 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a military dual status technician is a "civilian employee" for the purposes of "any ... provision of law"
  17. Section 709 - Emergency leave of absence

    10 U.S.C. § 709

    (a) EMERGENCY LEAVE OF ABSENCE.-The Secretary concerned may grant a member of the armed forces emergency leave of absence for a qualifying emergency. (b) LIMITATIONS.-An emergency leave of absence under this section- (1) may be granted only once for any member; (2) may be granted only to prevent the member from entering unearned leave status or excess leave status; and (3) may not extend for a period of more than 14 days. (c) QUALIFYING EMERGENCY.-In this section, the term "qualifying emergency"

  18. Section 1614.110 - Final action by agencies

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.110   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Compelling final decision “within 60 days of the end of the 30-day period for the complainant to request a hearing . . . where the complainant has not requested [one]”
  19. Section 1614.103 - Complaints of discrimination covered by this part

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.103   Cited 212 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that complaints of discrimination within the federal government extend to "all employment policies or practices affecting employees or applicants for employment "
  20. Section 1614.504 - Compliance with settlement agreements and final action

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.504   Cited 192 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that if an employee believes an agency has failed to comply with a settlement agreement, the employee must notify the EEO Director of noncompliance and, notably, may request that the terms of the agreement be implemented or that the prior EEO complaint be reinstated for further processing from the point in time that processing ceased
  21. Section 1614.109 - Hearings

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.109   Cited 133 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Governing administrative hearings
  22. Section 1614.503 - Enforcement of final Commission decisions

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.503   Cited 64 times
    Describing civil action for enforcement of administrative award