§

Madison Industries, Inc.

290 N.L.R.B. 1226 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Madison Industries, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company

    397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Gentzler Tool and Die Co.

    778 F.2d 1211 (6th Cir. 1985)

    Nos. 84-5699, 85-5830 and 85-5850. Argued November 6, 1985. Decided December 16, 1985. Elliott Moore, Howard E. Perlstein, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel N.L. R.B., Washington, D.C., Sharon Margolis Apfel, Anthony J. Celebrezze, Cleveland, Ohio, for N.L.R.B. Harvey B. Rector, Rector and Associates, Brian Rector, Joseph O'Leary, argued, Akron, Ohio, for Gentzler Tool and Die Co. Before MARTIN, JONES and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. We have consolidated cases involving these parties