10 Cited authorities
Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,612 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.
363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,893 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.
363 U.S. 564 (1960) Cited 2,229 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 timesRequiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG
118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941) Cited 39 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 118 F.2d 874, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 595, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1549, it was held that an employer's insistence on a provision in a contract with a bargaining agent, that during the period of the contract or at any future time the employees and the union would not request or demand a closed shop agreement or check-off system, warranted the National Labor Relations Board in inferring that the employer was not actuated by a genuine desire to reach an accord with the bargaining representative.
United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.
269 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 16 timesNo. 17646. July 30, 1959. David E. Feller, Arthur J. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., Hugo L. Black, Jr., Cooper, Mitch, Black Crawford, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant. Samuel Lang, New Orleans, La., T.K. Jackson, Jr., Mobile, Ala., for appellee. Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., Armbrecht, Jackson, McConnell DeMouy, Mobile, Ala., of counsel. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a denial by the trial court of an order granting
Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941) Cited 33 timesNos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"