§

Machinists, Local No. 697

223 N.L.R.B. 832 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Machinists, Local No. 697

6 Cited authorities

  1. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 59,260 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"

  2. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  3. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lummus Co.

    210 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times

    No. 14520. February 12, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Elmer Davis, Chief Law Officer, N.L.R.B., Fort Worth, Tex., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dean E. Denlinger, Atty., N.L.R.B., Dayton, Ohio, for petitioner. Quentin Keith, Cecil, Keith Mehaffy, Beaumont, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Die Tool M. L

    231 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11566. March 6, 1956. Rehearing Denied April 19, 1956. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Myron S. Waks, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George W. Christensen, Washington, D.C., Thomas J. Downs, William W. Curran, Chicago, Ill., for respondents. Before MAJOR, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. SWAIM, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the National Labor Relations