Machinists District 94 (Mcdonnell Douglas)

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
  3. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act
  4. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029

    409 U.S. 213 (1972)   Cited 53 times
    In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.
  6. Booster Lodge No. 405, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    412 U.S. 84 (1973)   Cited 35 times
    Holding the court of appeals may not properly overrule a decision of the Supreme Court in order to force its reconsideration
  7. Schonfeld v. Penza

    477 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that to state a cause of action, the alleged scheme to suppress dissent must be evident either in the established history or articulated policy of the union
  8. Pattern Makers' League v. N.L.R.B

    724 F.2d 57 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 6 times
    Invalidating union rule fining members who resign to return to work for struck employer
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Oil, Chemical Atomic Workers

    619 F.2d 708 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 8 times

    No. 79-1190. Submitted December 3, 1979. Decided March 13, 1980. Lafe Solomon, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; John G. Elligers, Jesse I. Etelson, Attys., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief. Francis X. Helgesen, Peterson, Engverg Peterson, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent; Stephanie M. Helgesen, Minneapolis, Minn., on

  10. N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Machinists

    575 F.2d 54 (2d Cir. 1978)

    No. 768, Docket 77-4202. Argued March 30, 1978. Decided April 17, 1978. Jesse I. Etelson, Washington, D.C. (N.L. R.B., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John G. Elligers, Atty., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Stephen Lichatin III, Warwick, R. I. (Breslin, Sweeney Gordon, David F. Sweeney, Warwick, R. I., of counsel), for respondent. Before FEINBERG, MANSFIELD