Macdonald Miller Co.

6 Cited authorities

American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board
380 U.S. 300 (1965) Cited 350 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 322 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.
373 U.S. 221 (1963) Cited 358 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.
351 F.2d 584 (7th Cir. 1965) Cited 68 times
Concluding that "when the entire record is considered there was substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that [employee's] discharge was the result of his having presented a grievance to the management" even though employee was overheard referring to company's superintendent as "the horse's ass" and was thereafter summarily discharged
Portland Willamette Co. v. N.L.R.B
534 F.2d 1331 (9th Cir. 1976) Cited 33 times
Determining that "permanent discharge for participation in union activities" creates "visible and continuing obstacles to the future exercise of employee rights"

Macdonald Miller Co.

6 Cited authorities

American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thor Power Tool Co.

Portland Willamette Co. v. N.L.R.B

Determining that "permanent discharge for participation in union activities" creates "visible and continuing obstacles to the future exercise of employee rights"