M. Rose Jonas
4 Cited authorities
In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 195 times 33 Legal AnalysesReciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"
Weiss Associates, Inc. v. HRL Associates, Inc.
902 F.2d 1546 (Fed. Cir. 1990) Cited 21 timesAffirming denial of registration of "TMM" mark for software because: it was likely to be confused with a registered mark "TMS," also used for software; "[t]he marks sound alike and look alike; and "[t]he products are very similar and directly compete."
Hydra Mac, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc.
507 F.2d 1399 (C.C.P.A. 1975) Cited 1 timesPatent Appeal No. 74-559. January 9, 1975. Herman H. Bains, Minneapolis, Minn., attorney of record, for appellant. Donald W. Canady, Beverly Hills, Cal., G. Cabell Busick, Washington, D.C., attorneys of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. RICH, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 180 USPQ 147 (1973), sustaining the opposition by appellee
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,616 times 275 Legal AnalysesGranting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"