§

M. J. Pirolli & Sons, Inc.

194 N.L.R.B. 241 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
M. J. Pirolli & Sons, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 994 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  4. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. A.P.W. Products Co.

    316 F.2d 899 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 40 times

    No. 258, Docket 27676. Argued March 11, 1963. Decided April 25, 1963. Melvin Pollack, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sidney A. Coven, Joseph Lepie, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Benjamin Wyle, New York City and Warren Woods, Washington, D.C., submitted brief as attorneys for amicus curiae, United Paper-makers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY

  7. Allegheny Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. N.L.R.B

    312 F.2d 529 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13960. Argued November 2, 1962. Decided December 26, 1962. Robert Lewis, New York City, (Jackson Lewis, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. Standau E. Weinbrecht, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Nancy M. Sherman, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge

  8. United States Rubber Company v. N.L.R.B

    384 F.2d 660 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 15 times

    No. 23129. October 25, 1967. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1968. Theo F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., Seymour Swerdlow, New York City, for petitioner, United States Rubber Co., Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., Arthur, Dry, Kalish, Taylor Wood, New York City, of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel., Warren M. Laddon, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.,

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Quick Shop Markets, Inc.

    416 F.2d 601 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 5 times
    In Quick Shop Markets, the Seventh Circuit agreed with the fact-finder's conclusion regarding pretext and noted that the employer did not care to investigate or determine the identity of the employee responsible for the cash shortages.