§
M. Eskin & Son

5 Cited authorities

  1. National Labor Rel. v. Broderick Wood

    261 F.2d 548 (10th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times
    In NLRB v. Broderick Wood Prod. Co., 10 Cir., 261 F.2d 548, 556, it was said: "Here, the union-security clause was the very basis for the charge of unfair labor practices. It was the union-security clause that Teamsters were enforcing when demanding that the employees be discharged.

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clearfield Cheese

    213 F.2d 70 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Clearfield Cheese Co., 213 F.2d 70 (3 Cir. 1954), a Board order to reinstate discharged striking employees was modified to exclude compulsory reinstatement of 21 employees guilty of picket line misconduct.

  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. E.A. Laboratories

    188 F.2d 885 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 15 times

    No. 79, Docket 21773. Argued April 3, 1951. Decided May 7, 1951. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Harvey B. Diamond, all of Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board, petitioner. Olvany, Eisner Donnelly, New York City (Merwin Lewis and Robert F. Welch, New York City, of counsel), for E.A. Laboratories, Inc., respondent. Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges. AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge. The

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Die Tool M. L

    231 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11566. March 6, 1956. Rehearing Denied April 19, 1956. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Myron S. Waks, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George W. Christensen, Washington, D.C., Thomas J. Downs, William W. Curran, Chicago, Ill., for respondents. Before MAJOR, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. SWAIM, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the National Labor Relations

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Scullin Steel Co.

    161 F.2d 143 (8th Cir. 1947)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Scullin Steel Co., 161 F.2d 143, the Eighth Circuit held that the company was not responsible for remarks as to labor matters by minor supervisors who had no real supervisory authority, who were included among the employees eligible to vote in an election conducted in a unit of non-supervisory employees, and who were actually only key men not entitled to any additional compensation.