§
M. Eskin & Son

10 Cited authorities

  1. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Auto Ventshade, Inc.

    276 F.2d 303 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 36 times

    No. 17965. March 25, 1960. Rehearing Denied July 28, 1960. Melvin Pollack, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., John W. Wilcox, Jr. (of Wilson, Branch Barwick), Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. In this case, as in National Labor Relations

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armato

    199 F.2d 800 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 38 times

    No. 10691. November 19, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx and Clark M. Robertson, Robertson Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Brothers Pet Supply, Inc.

    325 F.2d 68 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 18 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Brothers Pet Supply, Inc., 325 F.2d 68 (6th Cir. 1963), there was no dispute as to the occurrence of unfair labor practices, such as the employer's statement to several employees that "he would never sign a union contract, and... he would close his business before admitting the union."

  6. Confectionery and Tobacco Drivers v. N.L.R.B

    312 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 17 times
    Finding condonation

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Tempest Shirt Manufacturing Company

    285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. Tempest Shirt Manufacturing Co., 285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960), we held, in a proceeding on petition of the Board for adjudication in civil contempt, that a successor corporation was bound by an order in a previous case against the prior corporation. It is inherent in the nature of that proceeding that the court considered that it had jurisdiction over the successorship issue and that it was proper to decide that issue within the context of a proceeding in civil contempt.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Birdsall-Stockdale Motor

    208 F.2d 234 (10th Cir. 1953)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4653. November 5, 1953. Margaret L. Fassig, Kansas City, Mo., Atty., N.L.R.B., (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., and Alan R. Waterstone, Attys., N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for petitioner. Frederick A. Potruch (Potruch, Fredricks Lerten and Erwin Lerten, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief), for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge,

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Maintenance Corporation

    283 F.2d 569 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    No. 40, Docket 26255. Argued October 4, 1960. Decided October 28, 1960. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Elliott Moore, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Friedlander Gaines, New York City (Henry G. Friedlander, Norbert Ruttenberg, Edward Cherney, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before HINCKS, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Parran

    237 F.2d 373 (4th Cir. 1956)   Cited 7 times

    No. 7235. Argued October 5, 1956. Decided October 10, 1956. Arnold Ordman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. S. Harrison Kahn, Washington, D.C. (David Jay Hyman, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge, and BRYAN, District