7 Cited authorities
J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 332 (1944) Cited 457 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"
Labor Board v. Mine Workers
355 U.S. 453 (1958) Cited 47 timesCERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued January 6, 1958. Decided February 3, 1958. The National Labor Relations Board found that an employer had committed an unfair labor practice by assisting a union to defeat the efforts of a rival union to organize the employer's workers, but that the assisted union was not dominated by the employer. It ordered the employer to post certain notices and to withdraw and withhold recognition from the assisted
United Constr. Workers v. Haislip Baking Co.
223 F.2d 872 (4th Cir. 1955) Cited 52 timesIn Haislip Baking, an action based on 29 U.S.C. ยง 185(b), it is true the court stated that "[t]he verdict on the first trial was so excessive and so manifestly based on improper consideration, instead of upon the record, that it should have been set aside in its entirety and a complete new trial ordered," but the court then proceeded to direct entry of judgment for the defendant instead of remanding for a new trial.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Parker Bros. Co.
209 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 10 timesNo. 14607. January 15, 1954. Tom Mobley, Mobley Gough, Houston, Tex., for Shell Workers Independent Union. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, George J. Bott, General Counsel, Mary E. Williamson, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert C. Lanier, Bert H. Tunks, Bracewell Tunks, and Robert C. Lanier, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Failing in
National Labor Rel. Board v. Scullin Steel Co.
161 F.2d 143 (8th Cir. 1947) Cited 13 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Scullin Steel Co., 161 F.2d 143, the Eighth Circuit held that the company was not responsible for remarks as to labor matters by minor supervisors who had no real supervisory authority, who were included among the employees eligible to vote in an election conducted in a unit of non-supervisory employees, and who were actually only key men not entitled to any additional compensation.
Mile Branch Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers
266 F.2d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1959) Cited 2 timesNo. 14585. Argued February 25, 1959. Decided May 14, 1959. Mr. Samuel L. Goldstein, Pittsburgh, Pa., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Thurman Hill, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. John J. Wilson, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Harrison Combs, Willard P. Owens and William E. Rollow, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee. Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and BURGER, Circuit Judges. BAZELON
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGough Bakeries
153 F.2d 420 (5th Cir. 1946) Cited 9 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. McGough Bakeries Corp., 5 Cir., 153 F.2d 420, 421, the court observed: "The intermediate report of the trial examiner seems to us more like a trial argument than a judicial deliverance.