§
LVI, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 514 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener

    405 U.S. 117 (1972)   Cited 83 times
    Holding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner

  4. Progressive Elec., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    453 F.3d 538 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 13 times
    Declining to hear an employer’s Section 8(c) argument because it had "not been raised before the Board"

  5. Bloomington-Normal Seating Co. v. N.L.R.B

    357 F.3d 692 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 8 times

    No. 03-2929, 03-3101. Argued January 21, 2004. Decided February 5, 2004. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 33-CA-13769. Gary A. Wincek (argued), Laner, Muchin, Dumbrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Will J. Vance, National Labor Relations Board, Peoria, IL, Aileen Armstrong, Arthur F. Rosenfeld (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and POSNER and RIPPLE

  6. United States v. Foster

    9 F.R.D. 367 (S.D.N.Y. 1949)   Cited 49 times
    In United States v. Foster, D.C.N.Y., 9 F.R.D. 367, Judge Medina held that an accused has no right to be heard both in person and by attorney.