Ludwig Motor Corp.
3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Automated Business Systems v. N.L.R.B
497 F.2d 262 (6th Cir. 1974) Cited 29 timesHolding a bargaining order is appropriate where at one point the union had a majority but employer misconduct undermined majority strength and impeded the election process
Automation v. N.L.R.B
400 F.2d 141 (6th Cir. 1968) Cited 16 timesNos. 17771, 18038. August 30, 1968. John O. Henry, Dayton, Ohio, for petitioner; Hubert A. Estabrook, Francis X. Lee, Dayton, Ohio, on brief; Estabrook, Finn McKee, Thomas B. Kreutz, Ernest T. Hix, Dayton, Ohio, of counsel. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and