§

Lucky Cab Company

28-CA-023508 (N.L.R.B. Sep. 18, 2017)
Lucky Cab Company

10 Cited authorities

  1. ITT CONTINENTAL BAK. v. WILLIAM INGLIS SONS BAK

    459 U.S. 825 (1982)   Cited 254 times
    Finding it unnecessary to reach that issue

  2. Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

    522 U.S. 948 (1997)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. KSM Industries, Inc.

    682 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 12 times
    Finding unproblematic even a one-day turnround for a Board decision because “[t]he pendency of New Process Steel was hardly a secret, and for all we know the Board was already busy taking another look at the cases that were potentially affected by it”

  4. New Breed Leasing Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    111 F.3d 1460 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that an ALJ's credibility determinations will be upheld by the court “unless they are ‘inherently incredible or patently unreasonable’ ”

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. St. George Warehouse, Inc.

    645 F.3d 666 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 10-3411, 10-3546. Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 23, 2011. Opinion filed: June 23, 2011. Richard A. Cohen, Esq., Fred B. Jacob, Esq., Linda Dreeben, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent the National Labor Relations Board. John A. Craner, Esq., Craner, Satkin, Scheer Schwartz, P.C., Scotch Plains, NJ, for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner St. George Warehouse, Inc. Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

  6. Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Intern. Union, Local 37, Afl-Cio, CLC v. N.L.R.B.

    185 F. App'x 691 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 2 times

    Submitted April 6, 2006. This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3) David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld, A Professional Corporation, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner. Victoria E. Aguayo, Los Angeles, CA, Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., David A. Seid, Attorney, Jill A. Griffin, Esq., Daniel A. Blitz, Esq., NLRB--National Labor Relations Board, Contempt

  7. Lundy Packing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    856 F.2d 627 (4th Cir. 1988)   Cited 15 times
    Listing factors relevant to reasonable diligence in job search

  8. U.S. v. Giambattista

    835 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1987)

    835 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1987) U.S. v. Giambattista (Thomas Horace) No. 85-1138 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit December 11, 1987 Editorial Note: This opinion is published in the Federal reporter in a table titled §Table of decisions without reported opinions§. These decisions do not meet the specific criteria for publication and these decisions cannot be cited unless being used for res judicata or collateral estoppel. (Ninth Circuit Rules, Rule 36-3,28 U.S.C.A.) Appeal From: D.Nev.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lozano Enterprises

    356 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    No. 18205. February 2, 1966. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton, Frank Simpson, III, Don T. Hibner, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges, and CURTIS, District Judge. CURTIS, District Judge: The Lozano Enterprises, publisher of the Spanish newspaper, La Opinion

  10. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 30,318 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."