§

Lucky Cab Company

28-CA-023508 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 28, 2011)
Lucky Cab Company

10 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Solitron Devices v. Island Territory of Curacao

    416 U.S. 986 (1974)   Cited 131 times
    Granting enforcement

  3. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 96 times
    Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech

    134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election

  5. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  6. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  7. Kux Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    890 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 20 times
    Finding conduct of members of in-plant organizing committee not attributable to union

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Hood Furniture Mfg. Co.

    941 F.2d 325 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming Board's finding that third-party conduct did not justify setting aside election results even when terminated employees told former coworkers waiting in line to vote that they "kn[e]w damn well the way" they were "supposed to vote"

  9. Harlan #4 Coal Company v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 27 times

    No. 72-1997. Argued June 9, 1973. Decided January 10, 1974. John E. Jenkins, Jr., Jenkins, Schaub Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., on brief for petitioner. Fredric Sagan, N.L.R.B. for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and McCREE, Circuit Judges. McCREE

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.

    470 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 14 times
    Refusing to presume that the unlawful activity had an impact on or interference with the employees' freedom of choice where the record showed that the effect of the conduct was limited to specific employees, each of whom testified that he had voted his conscience and had ignored the unlawful conduct