§

Lowery Trucking Co.

177 N.L.R.B. 13 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Lowery Trucking Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Lane Drug Co. v. N.L.R.B

    391 F.2d 812 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times
    Upholding a bond in the amount of $123,429 in incremental administration costs in appeal of class settlement caused by six-month delay where state statute permitted it

  4. N.L.R.B. v. MY STORE, INC

    345 F.2d 494 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times

    No. 14770. April 7, 1965. Rehearing Denied June 4, 1965. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter Giesey, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., NLRB, for petitioner. Matthew E. Murray, Chicago, Ill., Charles E. Bliss, Taylorville, Ill., Norman P. Jones, Springfield, Ill., John D. O'Brien, Chicago, Ill., Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., Ensel, Jones Blanchard, Springfield, Ill., Hershey

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Keystone Floors Inc.

    306 F.2d 560 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Keystone Floors, Inc., 306 F.2d 560 (3rd Cir. 1962), salesmen whose agreements with a corporation provided that they were independent agents and not employees were held to be employees, on the grounds, among others, that the corporation trained the salesmen, notified them of "leads" weekly, which they were required to follow up, fixed selling prices, approved all sales before they could become final, and unilaterally changed the rate and method of the salesmen's compensation.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Hamilton Plastic Molding Company

    312 F.2d 723 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 9 times

    No. 14958. February 6, 1963. Marion Griffin, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Broad, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio (Frank H. Stewart, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief; Robert G. Woellner, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for respondent. Before McALLISTER, MILLER, and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. This