§

Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

299 N.L.R.B. 16 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Blake Const. Co., Inc.

    663 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that petitioner's exception "to the ALJ's conclusions of law as `based on misstatements of facts, mistaken premises, suppositions, hearsay, and misapplication of law'" sufficiently preserved a due process issue

  5. General Teamsters Allied Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    427 F.2d 582 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 13 times
    Timing of wage increase coupled with widespread publication of it

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S.E. Michigan Gas

    485 F.2d 1239 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 3 times

    No. 72-2174. Argued October 15, 1973. Decided October 19, 1973. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Howard J. Kaufman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Gilbert C. Cox, Jr., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondent. Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and McCREE, Circuit Judges. ORDER This case is before us upon the application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations