14 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Labor Board v. Laughlin
301 U.S. 1 (1937) Cited 1,499 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey
233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956) Cited 133 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 timesUpholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
N.L.R.B. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
361 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 27 timesHolding that employer not "relieved of its duty to obey the order to bargain during the pendency of the proceedings to enforce the earlier order"
N.L.R.B. v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.
340 F.2d 568 (5th Cir. 1965) Cited 28 timesNo. 21110. January 11, 1965. Lawrence Gold, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert A. Armstrong, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Henry L. Scott, Houston, Tex., Trotter, Childs, Fortenbach McClure, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY, District Judge. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement
Nix v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
418 F.2d 1001 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 20 timesAffirming Board's reversal of ALJ's conclusion that employee had been discharged because of union activity, since this conclusion is a factual inference
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors
196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952) Cited 37 timesNo. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations
Section 23:1601 - [Effective 12/31/2024] Disqualification for benefits
La. Stat. tit. 23 § 1601 Cited 444 timesAn individual shall be disqualified for benefits: (1) (a) If the administrator finds that he has left his employment from a base period or subsequent employer without good cause attributable to a substantial change made to the employment by the employer. Such disqualification shall continue until such time as the claimant can requalify by demonstrating that he: (i) Has been paid wages for work subject to the Louisiana Employment Security Law or to the unemployment insurance law of any other state