§

Louisburgh Sportswear Co.

173 N.L.R.B. 678 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Louisburgh Sportswear Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  5. Amalgamated Clothing Wrks. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    371 F.2d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 29 times
    Considering employer's "lack of disavowal" of individual's actions

  6. Bryant Chucking Grinder Company v. N.L.R.B

    389 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 19 times

    No. 25, Docket 30844. Argued October 2, 1967. Decided December 12, 1967. Kenneth C. McGuiness, Washington, D.C. (Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George B. Driesen, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Peter Ames Eveleth, Washington, D.C., Atty., on the brief), for respondent. Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Gotham Shoe Manufacturing Co.

    359 F.2d 684 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times

    No. 121, Docket 29793. Argued November 3, 1965. Decided January 14, 1966. Harold B. Shore, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel K. Levene, Binghamton, N.Y. (David Levene, Levene, Gouldin Thompson, Binghamton, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent. Before KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit

  8. Dayco Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 577 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 10 times
    In Dayco we were dealing with dual purpose cards, which on their face authorized the union as collective bargaining agent and to hold elections.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Greenfield Components Corp.

    317 F.2d 85 (1st Cir. 1963)   Cited 10 times

    No. 6033. May 10, 1963. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Seymour Strongin, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Sidney A. Coven, with whom Joseph E. Lepie and Melvin Pierce, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent. Before HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges, and GIGNOUX, District Judge. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor