Lou Taylor, Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
  3. J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    461 F.2d 490 (4th Cir. 1972)   Cited 60 times
    Inquiring whether substantial evidence supported a finding that a benefit announcement was timed to "give [employees] cause to infer that the benefit might be withdrawn or future benefits withheld should they select a union to represent them"