§

Los Angeles Building and Construction Trades Council

214 N.L.R.B. 562 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Los Angeles Building and Construction Trades Council

14 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  3. Nash v. United States

    229 U.S. 373 (1913)   Cited 575 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the Sherman Act does not require an overt act for antitrust conspiracy liability

  4. Cramer v. United States

    325 U.S. 1 (1945)   Cited 113 times
    Noting in dictum that it did not "intimate that Congress could dispense with two-witness rule merely by giving the same offense [of treason] another name."

  5. United States v. Patten

    226 U.S. 525 (1913)   Cited 196 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In United States v. Patten, 226 U.S. 525, 543, running a corner in the available supply of a staple commodity, normally the subject of interstate commerce, in order to enhance its price artificially in the whole country, although the corner was carried on only in New York by sale of cotton futures, was held to be a monopoly of interstate commerce in violation of the Federal Anti-Trust Act. It was the intent to monopolize such commerce and its probability of success which sustained the indictment.

  6. Agnew v. United States

    165 U.S. 36 (1897)   Cited 227 times
    Rejecting a challenge to the failure to use the defense instruction on presumption of innocence, where both the charge requested and the charge given used the word "until," with the supreme court stating that the charge given was "quite correct," albeit without a challenge being raised to the use of the term "until"

  7. Truck Dvrs. Un. L. No. 413, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    Nos. 17662, 17663. Argued October 30, 1963. Decided April 9, 1964. Certiorari Denied November 16, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 264. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,662. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Messrs. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17,663. Mr. Gary Green, Atty

  8. Orange Belt Dist. Coun. of Ptrs. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    No. 17388. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided January 30, 1964. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioners. Mr. David Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board

  9. Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    Subcontracting in cases of lack of equipment to companies employing members of same local whenever possible

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    405 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 405 F.2d at 162, this court held that only that part of a contract that exceeds the limits of the construction industry provision is negated.