Los Angeles Building and Construction Trades Council

7 Cited authorities

Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.
309 U.S. 350 (1940) Cited 315 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 times
Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines
303 U.S. 261 (1938) Cited 264 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.
Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co.
309 U.S. 261 (1940) Cited 211 times
In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.
Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills
339 U.S. 563 (1950) Cited 132 times
Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"
Labor Board v. Pool Mfg. Co.
339 U.S. 577 (1950) Cited 31 times
In Pool, the Board and the employer had been negotiating for at least part of those two and a half years, and the court found that "exhaustion of negotiation techniques before a decree is requested may consume many months after the Board's order and before such techniques fail."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fickett-Brown Mfg. Co.
140 F.2d 883 (5th Cir. 1944) Cited 10 times
No. 10833. February 8, 1944. Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Fickett-Brown Manufacturing Company, Inc., to enforce an order of the Board. Petition granted. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, and John E. Lawyer, Attorney, NLRB, all of Washington, D.C., and Paul E. Kuelthau, Regional Attorney, NLRB, of Atlanta, Ga., for

Los Angeles Building and Construction Trades Council

7 Cited authorities

Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.

Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co.

In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.

Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills

Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"

Labor Board v. Pool Mfg. Co.

In Pool, the Board and the employer had been negotiating for at least part of those two and a half years, and the court found that "exhaustion of negotiation techniques before a decree is requested may consume many months after the Board's order and before such techniques fail."

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fickett-Brown Mfg. Co.