Lori A. Adams, Complainant, v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,614 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"
  3. Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

    417 U.S. 188 (1974)   Cited 1,404 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the burden of proof to show that it falls within the stated exemption
  4. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

    567 F.2d 429 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 353 times
    Holding that under Title VII class action, single-filing cannot revive claims that are no longer viable at the time of filing
  5. Kouba v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    691 F.2d 873 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 108 times   24 Legal Analyses
    In Kouba, we cautioned that the use of prior pay to defend against equal-pay violations "can easily be used to capitalize on the unfairly low salaries historically paid to women."
  6. Horner v. Mary Institute

    613 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 79 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the differential in salary between plaintiff and her comparator was the result of negotiations, which is sufficient to rebut plaintiff's prima facie case of pay discrimination
  7. Crockwell v. Blackmoon-Mooring Steamatic

    627 F. Supp. 800 (W.D. Tenn. 1985)   Cited 7 times

    No. 82-2919 GB. April 12, 1985. Donald A. Donati and Wanda Donati, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff Mary Crockwell. Jason O. Young, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., for defendant Blackmon-Mooring and Steamatic. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GIBBONS, District Judge. Plaintiff here seeks relief for alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et seq. and 29 U.S.C. ยง 206(d). The court heard the case on September 6 and 7, 1984. The court has considered all the evidence presented and applicable law and makes