§
Lord Jim's

7 Cited authorities

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. N.L.R.B

    613 F.2d 107 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that remand is appropriate when the Board fails to adequately explain the factual basis for its opinion

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Newspapers, Inc.

    515 F.2d 334 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 20 times

    No. 74-3004. June 27, 1975. Rehearing Denied August 29, 1975. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John F. Depenbrock, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Reg. Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for petitioner. Robert L. Ballow, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before TUTTLE, GODBOLD and MORGAN, Circuit Judges: TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board

  3. Retail Store Emp. U., Local 428 v. N.L.R.B

    528 F.2d 1225 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 14 times
    Affirming a Board finding that there was no substantial continuity because of a leadership change

  4. Kahn v. Hotel Rest. Employees' Bartenders

    597 F.2d 1317 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times

    No. 77-2380. May 29, 1979. Martin Eichner, Romines Eichner, Palo Alto, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Alan C. Davis, Davis, Cowell Bowe, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Charles B. Renfrew, Judge. Before TUTTLE, ELY, and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. Honorable Elbert P. Tuttle, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: The District Court's judgment is

  5. Kahn v. Hotel Rest. Emp. Bartenders, Etc.

    469 F. Supp. 14 (N.D. Cal. 1977)   Cited 9 times

    No. C-75-1903-CBR. February 3, 1977. Dan M. Siegel, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiffs. Davis, Cowell Bowe, Alan C. Davis, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION RENFREW, District Judge. This is a class action brought under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act ("LMRDA"), 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., challenging the merger of five San Francisco union locals into one. Plaintiffs contend that defendants violated the terms of both the international union's constitution and the

  6. William B. Tanner Co. v. N.L.R.B

    517 F.2d 982 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 2 times

    No. 74-2023. June 12, 1975. James E. Irwin, Irwin Owens, Louis R. Lucas, Ratner, Sugarmon, Lucas Salky, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Robert A. Giannasi, Madge F. Jefferson, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Laurence J. Cohen, Sherman, Dunn, Cohen Leifer, Washington, D.C., for intervenor. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In an earlier

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,086 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"