§

LONGWOOD SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

364 NLRB No. 50 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
LONGWOOD SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication

  2. Nathan Katz Realty, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    251 F.3d 981 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 14 times
    In Nathan Katz, we vacated the Board's decision because "during the election two Union agents were in a car parked within twenty feet of" the side door of a church in which the voting was taking place, and within a "25-yard no-electioneering zone."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hood Furniture Mfg. Co.

    941 F.2d 325 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming Board's finding that third-party conduct did not justify setting aside election results even when terminated employees told former coworkers waiting in line to vote that they "kn[e]w damn well the way" they were "supposed to vote"

  4. Maremont Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    177 F.3d 573 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 98-5042, 98-5130 Argued: March 12, 1999 Decided: May 25, 1999 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 10-CA-30577. ARGUED: Robert J. Englehart, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLATE COURT BRANCH, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Jonathan E. Kaplan, KIESEWETTER, WISE, KAPLAN, SCHWIMMER PRATHER, Memphis, Tennessee, for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: Robert J. Englehart, Frederick C. Havard,

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Springfield Hosp

    899 F.2d 1305 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 11 times

    No. 177, Docket 89-4055. Argued September 29, 1989. Decided March 26, 1990. Steven Goldstein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Linda Dreeben, Supervisory Atty., Joseph E. Desio, Acting General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., of counsel), for petitioner. Brian E. Hayes, Springfield, Mass. (Ralph F. Abbott, James M. Trono, Skoler, Abbott, Hayes and Presser, of counsel), for respondent. John M. Creane, Milford, Conn., for

  6. Kusan Mfg. Co., a Div. of Kusan v. N.L.R.B

    749 F.2d 362 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 83-5851, 83-5855. Argued September 24, 1984. Decided December 7, 1984. William N. Ozier (argued), Bass, Berry Sims, Nashville, Tenn., for petitioner. Elliott Moore/Michael Messitte (argued), Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John Burgoyne, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KEITH and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and POTTER, District Judge. Honorable John W. Potter, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio

  7. Shoreline Enterprises of Am., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    262 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 46 times
    In Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. NLRB, 262 F.2d 933 (5 Cir. 1959), the court recognized that a Board agent is present not only to make sure eligible voters vote but also to make sure that an employee who thinks he is eligible may cast a challenged ballot.

  8. Summa Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    625 F.2d 293 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 14 times
    In Summa, the Board Agent, without consulting the two observers for the employer, assented to a third union observer during the first of two voting sessions, although the Stipulation there provided for an equal number of observers for each side. This court agreed with the employer that there was a significant risk that "the imbalance, with the acquiesence of the Board agent, could create an impression of predominance on the part of the Union and partiality on the part of the Board."

  9. Louis-Allis Company v. N.L.R.B

    463 F.2d 512 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 17 times

    No. 71-1361. Argued February 23, 1972. Decided June 14, 1972. Rehearing Denied July 5, 1972. M. J. Diederich, Beverly Hills, Cal., for petitioner. Richard J. Scupi, Washington, D.C., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KILEY, STEVENS and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges. SPRECHER, Circuit

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.

    470 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 14 times
    Refusing to presume that the unlawful activity had an impact on or interference with the employees' freedom of choice where the record showed that the effect of the conduct was limited to specific employees, each of whom testified that he had voted his conscience and had ignored the unlawful conduct