§

Longshoremen Ilwu Local 7 (Georgia Pacific)

291 N.L.R.B. 89 (N.L.R.B. 1988)
Longshoremen Ilwu Local 7 (Georgia Pacific)

16 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.

    475 U.S. 643 (1986)   Cited 5,502 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement

  2. Paperworkers v. Misco, Inc.

    484 U.S. 29 (1987)   Cited 2,877 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding jurisdiction to enforce a collective bargaining agreement only vests once grievance and arbitration procedures are exhausted

  3. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  4. Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

    363 U.S. 593 (1960)   Cited 3,893 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

  5. W.R. Grace Co. v. Rubber Workers

    461 U.S. 757 (1983)   Cited 1,080 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitrator's conclusion that he was not bound by a prior arbitrator's decision was binding on the federal courts

  6. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  7. Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.

    363 U.S. 564 (1960)   Cited 2,229 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

  8. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  9. Little Crow Mill. v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad

    476 U.S. 1158 (1986)   Cited 92 times
    Noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers

    400 U.S. 297 (1971)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that Section 8(b)(B) applied to coercive conduct directed toward secondary employer even where union primarily demanded that employers reassign work