Longshoremen Ilwu (California Cartage)
4 Cited authorities
National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 612 (1967) Cited 392 timesHolding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters
429 U.S. 507 (1977) Cited 138 timesStating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
447 U.S. 490 (1980) Cited 65 times 4 Legal AnalysesIn NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).
Intern. Longshoremen's Ass'n, v. N.L.R.B
613 F.2d 890 (D.C. Cir. 1979) Cited 16 timesNos. 77-1735, 77-1758 and 78-1510. Argued January 18, 1979. Decided September 25, 1979. Rehearing Denied December 13, 1979. Certiorari Granted January 21, 1980. Thomas W. Gleason, New York City, for petitioner International Longshoremen's Ass'n. Constantine P. Lambos, New York City, with whom Donato Caruso, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner New York Shipping Ass'n, Inc. Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., N.L.R.B., and Kathy L. Krieger, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme