§

Longo En-Tech Puerto Rico, LLC

12-CA-248406 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 7, 2020)
Longo En-Tech Puerto Rico, LLC

13 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 805 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  4. Camelot Terrace, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    824 F.3d 1085 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 11 times

    No. 12-1071 C/w 12-1218 06-10-2016 Camelot Terrace, Inc. and Galesburg Terrace, Inc., Petitioners v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent Service Employees International Union, Healthcare Illinois Indiana (Previously SEIU Local 4), Intervenor Christopher Landau argued the cause for the petitioners. John S. Irving, Jr., Washington, DC, was with him on brief. Barbara A. Sheehy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gimrock Constr., Inc.

    695 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    No. 11–11561. 2012-09-18 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GIMROCK CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent. Ruth E. Burdick, Jeffrey William Burritt, Linda Dreeben, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Charles S. Caulkins, Cathy M. Stutin, Fisher & Phillips, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent. TJOFLAT Ruth E. Burdick, Jeffrey William Burritt, Linda Dreeben, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Charles S. Caulkins, Cathy M. Stutin, Fisher

  6. Industrial Un. of Mar. Ship. W. v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 63 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14052, 14102. Argued May 21, 1963. Decided July 30, 1963. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Goldstein Barkan, Michael Brodie, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, AFL-CIO. John H. Morse, New York City (Frank Cummings, New York City, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, on the brief), for Bethlehem Steel Co. (Shipbuilding Division). Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli

  7. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    968 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 19 times
    In Sparks Nugget, the Ninth Circuit went further by finding that the inaccessibility exception does not apply at all in situations where customers, and not employees, are the target audience; alternatively, the court stated that, even if the exception were applicable, Lechmere would require a finding that the intended audience is presumptively not inaccessible "because the targets of the union protest do not reside on the employer's property."

  8. All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    540 F. App'x 484 (6th Cir. 2013)

    Case Nos. 11-2184/11-2282 08-28-2013 ALL SEASONS CLIMATE CONTROL, INC., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. ALICE M. BATCHELDER NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0797n.06 ON APPEAL FROM THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; MERRITT and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges. ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. ("All Seasons") appeals from a decision and order of the National

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Cauthorne

    691 F.2d 1023 (D.C. Cir. 1982)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Ongoing liability for ULP ends when parties reach agreement or good-faith impasse

  10. Calex Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 904 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that the employees' discussion at pre-strike meeting are significant in finding an unfair labor practice strike