Longhorn Transfer Service, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,499 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
  2. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 994 times
    Defining substantial evidence
  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Pulp Paper Corporation

    273 F.2d 660 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 28 times

    No. 17703. January 12, 1960. Alfred Brummel, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Frederick U. Reel, Fred J. Hahn, Attys., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Theo. Hamilton, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has

  6. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    120 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1941)   Cited 33 times

    Nos. 7503, 7538. Argued February 17, 1941. Decided May 12, 1941. On Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Bethlehem Steel Company and another to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Plan of Employees' Representation at the Steelton, Pa., Plant of the Bethlehem Steel Company and another intervened in support of the petition and the Steel Workers Organizing Committee intervened in support of the order

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Elec. City Dyeing

    178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Electric City Dyeing Co., 178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950), this court had occasion to rule on a comparable situation where the employer alleged that certain employees were discharged for unsatisfactory work whereas the Board made a finding, in which we concurred, that the dismissals were for union activity.
  8. Trumbull Asphalt Co. of Delaware v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.2d 382 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13743. March 4, 1963. James F. Flanagan, Harold T. Halfpenny, Richard F. Hahn, Mary M. Shaw, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Judith Bleich Kahn, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. This matter is before us on petition of Trumbull Asphalt

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Duval Engineering Contr. Co.

    311 F.2d 291 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 2 times
    Requesting employees to act as informers with respect to union activities
  10. N.L.R.B. v. R.I. Zeigler, Inc.

    298 F.2d 671 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 2 times

    No. 18863. February 9, 1962. Rehearing Denied March 14, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mark L. Taliafero, C.V. Stelzenmuller, Birmingham, Ala. (Moore, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman Burr, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for respondent. Before RIVES, CAMERON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The Board

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"