§

Local Union No. 269, IBEW, AFL-CIO

149 N.L.R.B. 768 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Local Union No. 269, IBEW, AFL-CIO

4 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  3. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Stevedoring Contr. Co.

    332 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times

    No. 20893. June 17, 1964. Rehearing Denied July 30, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. M.L. Cook, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, PRETTYMAN and JONES, Circuit Judges. Senior Circuit Judge of the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting by designation. PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge: This is a petition filed by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order which held the