Local Union No. 18, IUOE, AFL-CIO, Etc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors

    196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 37 times

    No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Union

    194 F.2d 698 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 31 times
    Ignoring of prior action before a Wisconsin state agency
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Spector Freight System, Inc.

    273 F.2d 272 (8th Cir. 1960)   Cited 16 times
    In Spector the factor that the reinstatement fee was "apparent[ly]" three times a month's dues was not the defect, but rather the defect arose from the fact that one pre-hire month's dues was included in the fee.
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Williams

    195 F.2d 669 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 23 times

    No. 6370. Argued March 6, 1952. Decided April 1, 1952. Arnold Ordman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., and Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Takoma Park, Md., on the brief), for petitioner. Isadore S. Bernstein, Columbia, S.C. (Randolph Murdaugh, Hampton, S.C., and Henry H. Edens, Columbia

  8. Brewers and Maltsters L. Un. No. 6 v. N.L.R.B

    301 F.2d 216 (8th Cir. 1962)   Cited 8 times
    In Brewers and Maltsters Local Union No. 6 v. NLRB, 301 F.2d 216 (C.A.8, 1962), the company was charged with discharging at the union's request an employee who was "obnoxious, foul-mouthed and profane, prone to apply vile and indecent descriptions to others and one with a propensity for arguing and complaining... disliked generally, tolerated by a few, frustrated (etc.)."
  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft, Agricultural Implement Workers

    297 F.2d 272 (1st Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 5828. Heard October 2, 1961. Decided December 27, 1961. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, the National

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shedd-Brown MFG

    213 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 14 times

    No. 11031. May 17, 1954. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing June 17, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Clarence A. Meter, Arnold Ordman, Duane Beeson, and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Donald O. Wright, Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court