§
Local Union 219

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.

    352 U.S. 282 (1957)   Cited 139 times
    Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"

  2. Local No. 3, Etc. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    210 F.2d 325 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 38 times
    In Local No. 3 etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 8 Cir., 210 F.2d 325, it was held that the employer had not been guilty of an unfair labor practice in the discharge of employees.

  3. International Un. of Op. Eng. v. Dahlem Const

    193 F.2d 470 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 32 times
    Indicating the “notice to terminate [a CBA] must be clear and explicit”

  4. Lion Oil Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    221 F.2d 231 (8th Cir. 1955)   Cited 4 times

    No. 15158. April 22, 1955. Jeff Davis, El Dorado, Ark. (B.L. Allen and H.D. Dickens, El Dorado, Ark., on the brief), for petitioner. Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Lindsay P. Walden and William E. Rentfro, Denver, Colo., filed brief for Oil Workers International Union, CIO, as amici curiæ. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. VOGEL, Circuit Judge. This case