§
Local No. 24

13 Cited authorities

  1. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb

    331 U.S. 722 (1947)   Cited 863 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding the FLSA contains "no definition that solves problems as to the limits of the employer-employee relationship under the Act"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. United States v. Silk

    331 U.S. 704 (1947)   Cited 541 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that truck drivers who owned their own trucks and hired their own helpers were "small businessmen" who were properly classified as independent contractors

  4. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  5. International Bhd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    181 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 89 times

    No. 102, Docket 21365. Argued January 4, 1950. Decided February 24, 1950. S.A. Syme, White Plains, N.Y., L. Sherman, P.R. Collins, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.N. Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., James V. Altieri, New York City, for respondent. Louis Sherman, Washington, D.C., for Brotherhood of Elect

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  7. Jones v. Goodson

    121 F.2d 176 (10th Cir. 1941)   Cited 67 times
    In Jones v. Goodson, 10 Cir., 121 F.2d 176, we held that the relationship between a taxicab company and the drivers of taxicabs was that of employer and employee, within the meaning of the Act.

  8. Casement v. Brown

    148 U.S. 615 (1893)   Cited 87 times
    Finding that the status of independent contractor was not affected by the fact that “the contract provided for their daily supervision and approval of both material and work”

  9. National Lab. R. Bd. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters

    212 F.2d 216 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 28 times

    No. 11045. April 21, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Alvin Lieberman, Atty., N.L.R.B., New York City, for petitioner. Ralph B. Gregg, Edward J. Fillenwarth, Indianapolis, Ind., Gregg, Fillion, Fillenwarth Hughes, Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel, for respondent. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Chief Judge. This case

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Steinberg

    182 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 26 times

    No. 12814. June 7, 1950. Rehearing Denied July 17, 1950. C. Paul Barker, Special Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., New Orleans, La., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Haywood H. Hillyer, Jr., New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before HOLMES, McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. The question here is whether certain named fur trappers are employees of respondents