Local No. 1, Elevator Constructors

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 335 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
  2. Newspaper Guild, Erie News. Guild v. N.L.R.B

    489 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1973)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 72-1521, 72-1633. Argued March 8, 1973. Decided November 30, 1973. John M. McLaughlin, William C. Sennett, Knox, Graham, Pearson, McLaughlin Sennett, Erie, Pa., for petitioner in No. 72-1521. Richard H. Zamboldi, Elderkin, Martin Kelly, Erie, Pa., for petitioner in No. 73-1633. Elliot Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joseph E. Mayer, William H. DuRoss, III, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Toledo Locals Nos. 15-P 272

    437 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20297. January 27, 1971. Michael F. Messitte, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail Cooley Baskir, Michael F. Messitte, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Warren D. Wolfe, Toledo, Ohio, for respondent. James F. Duggan, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor; James F. Duggan, George W. Moehlenhof, on brief; McDermott, Will Emery, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before

  4. N.L.R.B. v. N.M. Dist. Coun. of Carpenters

    454 F.2d 1116 (10th Cir. 1972)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 128-70, 129-70. February 4, 1972. Vivian Asplund, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. Gerald R. Bloomfield, Albuquerque, N. M. (Kool, Kool Bloomfield, Albuquerque, N. M., on the brief), for respondents. Before HILL, SETH and HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judges. HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. In these proceedings the National Labor Relations Board

  5. Communication Wkrs. of Amer., L. 6003 v. Jackson

    516 P.2d 529 (Okla. 1973)   Cited 4 times

    No. 45130. October 23, 1973. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1973. Appeal from District Court of Custer County; Eph Monroe, Trial Judge. Union brought this action to enforce fine assessed by Union against appellee, a Union member. The Trial Court entered judgment for appellee and the Union appeals. Reversed and remanded with instructions. Jerry D. Sokolosky, Oklahoma City, for appellant. Meacham, Meacham Meacham, Clinton, for appellee. BERRY, Justice: The Union brought this action to enforce payment

  6. NLRB v. San Francisco Typographical U. No. 21

    486 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 4 times
    In San Francisco, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the union violated § 8(b)(1)(B) when it disciplined a foreman who discharged an employee prior to a strike and reversed the Board's finding that disciplining three strikebreakers who were also supervisors was an unfair labor practice.
  7. N.L.R.B. v. L. 2150, Int'l Bro. of Elec. Wkrs

    486 F.2d 602 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 4 times

    No. 71-1864. Argued November 29, 1972. Decided July 13, 1973. Rehearing En Banc Denied August 6, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Daniel M. Katz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert H. Gorske, Milwaukee, Wis., for intervenor. Alan M. Levy, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent. Before KILEY and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, District Judge. District Judge Jesse E. Eschbach of the Northern District of Indiana is sitting by designation. CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge

  8. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,083 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB