§

Local Joint Executive Board, Etc.

153 N.L.R.B. 392 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Local Joint Executive Board, Etc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  2. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

  3. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    280 F.2d 616 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 15038, 15079. Argued December 3, 1959. Decided May 19, 1960. Mr. Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, and L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15038. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  4. N.L.R.B. v. L. 210, Int'l Bro. of Teamsters

    330 F.2d 46 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 7 times

    No. 352, Docket 28578. Argued March 13, 1964. Decided April 6, 1964. Jules H. Gordon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Katz, New York City (Katz Wolchok, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, SMITH, Circuit Judge, and LEVET, District Judge. Sitting

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Howard Johnson Company

    317 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    No. 14063. Argued January 22, 1963. Decided May 15, 1963. Elliott Moore, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Daniel O. Steele, Wollaston, Mass., for respondent. Before STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and SHAW, District Judge. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The sole question presented by this case

  6. American Rubber Prod. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    214 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 12 times
    Relying upon Diaz

  7. N.L.R.B. v. L. Joint Executive Bd., Hotel

    301 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 5 times

    No. 17413. March 5, 1962. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Elliott Moore and Daniel J. Harrington, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gyler Gottlieb, Emanuel Gyler, Long Beach, Cal., for respondents. Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement

  8. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"