Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Restaurant Employees

4 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
  2. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."
  3. N.L.R.B. v. INT'L ASS'N OF MACHINISTS, ETC

    263 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Machinists, 9 Cir., 263 F.2d 796, 799, it was held that the actions of a union in listing an employer on its "'We Do Not Patronize' list" and in urging others not to do business with him were protected by the First Amendment and did not constitute unfair labor practice.
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Denver Bldg

    192 F.2d 577 (10th Cir. 1952)   Cited 7 times

    No. 4260. October 18, 1951. Rehearing Denied January 5, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Finding, A. Norman Somers, Washington, D.C., and Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Philip Hornbein, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding under Section 10(e) of the National