Local 928, International Longshoremen

9 Cited authorities

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  3. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
  4. Plumbers' Union v. Borden

    373 U.S. 690 (1963)   Cited 142 times
    In Plumbers v. Borden, 373 U.S. 690 (1963), for example, an employee sued his union, which operated a hiring hall, claiming that the union had arbitrarily refused to refer him for employment on one particular occasion.
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Local 269

    357 F.2d 51 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15268. Argued October 21, 1965. Decided February 4, 1966. Warren Davision, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas L. Parsonnet, Newark, N.J. (Parsonnet Parsonnet, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for Local 269, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO

  6. N.L.R.B. v. United Ass'n, J. A. of Plumbing

    424 F.2d 390 (6th Cir. 1970)   Cited 6 times
    Requiring "specific affirmative testimony" that a valid section 8(f) agreement existed and was followed
  7. N.L.R.B. v. International Ass'n of Machinists

    279 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 13 times

    No. 16564. June 4, 1960. Rehearing Denied July 11, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Alfred Avins, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Plato E. Papps, Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before CHAMBERS and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge. MATHES, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under

  8. Skouras Theatres Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    361 F.2d 826 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 15662, 15671. Argued May 24, 1966. Decided June 7, 1966. Louis M. Weber, New York City (Wolf, Baumann Burstein, Jersey City, N.J., on the brief), for petitioner Skouras Theatres Corp. James A. Major, Hackensack, N.J. (Major Major, Hackensack, N.J., on the brief), for petitioner International Alliance, etc., Local 642. Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"