§

Local 911, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

122 N.L.R.B. 499 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Local 911, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")

  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  3. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  4. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  5. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  6. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. L. Un. No. 55

    218 F.2d 226 (10th Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times
    Recognizing amendments made closed-shop agreements illegal

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Carpet, L. R.T. Layers

    213 F.2d 49 (10th Cir. 1954)   Cited 7 times
    Presuming on appeal that in a case tried before the court a judge will only consider competent evidence

  10. J.A. Utley Company v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    217 F.2d 885 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 12240, 12250. December 27, 1954. Robert C. Winter, Detroit, Mich. (H. Wm. Butler, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for J.A. Utley Co. George E. Ganos, Detroit, Mich. (Boaz Siegel, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for Millwrights' Local. James A. Ryan, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for N.L.R.B. Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case, the employer company and a local millwrights'