§

Local 872, Longshoremen

163 N.L.R.B. 586 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Local 872, Longshoremen

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

    341 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 17581, 17615. March 5, 1965. Peter M. Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B. made argument for petitioner and filed brief with Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Lee M. Modjeska, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. William E. Fortas and Earl W. DeHart, of Fowler, Fortas DeHart, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., made argument for respondent and filed brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and MEHAFFY, Circuit

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 369 International Hod Carriers' Building & Common Laborers' Union

    240 F.2d 539 (3d Cir. 1956)   Cited 10 times

    No. 11945. Argued October 5, 1956. Decided December 3, 1956. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1957. Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Albert K. Plone, Camden, N.J., (Plone Tomar, Camden, N.J., on the brief), for Local 369, International Hod Carriers' Building and Common Laborers' Union of America, AFL, respondent

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company

    286 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 2 times
    Disapproving factfinder's decision to discredit testimony on the basis it was “self-serving” because it is inappropriate to “suggest[] that the sworn testimony of a witness is to be discredited because it supports that for which he contends”

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Laister-Kauffmann A.

    144 F.2d 9 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Laister-Kauffmann Aircraft Corp., 8 Cir., 144 F.2d 9, and Allen-Morrison Sign Co., 79 N.L.R.B. 904, some indicia of actual supervisory authority were present as well as elements of estoppel.