§

Local 660, United Workers of America (Alstate Maintenance LLC)

29-CB-103994 (N.L.R.B. May. 9, 2016)
Local 660, United Workers of America (Alstate Maintenance LLC)

5 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 278 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Retail Clerks Local 588, Retail Clerks International Ass'n

    587 F.2d 984 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 16 times

    No. 77-1791. December 11, 1978. Elliott Moore, David Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David J. Salniker, Berkeley, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ANDERSON and HUG, Circuit Judges, and REAL, District Judge. The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: After a hearing the National

  5. Cascade General v. N.L.R.B

    9 F.3d 731 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 2 times
    Finding that Board's order requiring employer to reimburse employees who did not freely choose union for fees and dues "promotes the policies of the [NLRA] by assisting in completely disestablishing the illegally constituted union, severing its connection with the employer, restoring freedom of choice to the employee, and encouraging the employee to exercise his rights under the Act"