§

Local 636, Plumbers and Pipefitters

177 N.L.R.B. 189 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Local 636, Plumbers and Pipefitters

13 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  3. Local No. 5, United Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 366 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 21 times

    No. 17130. Argued March 26, 1963. Decided June 6, 1963. Mr. Donald J. Capuano, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel at the time of argument, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for

  4. American Boiler Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B

    404 F.2d 556 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19034. December 6, 1968. Rehearing En Banc Denied January 21, 1969. Rehearing Denied January 29, 1969. Kenneth C. McGuiness, of Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Stanley R. Strauss on brief and reply brief with him. Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on briefs

  5. Beacon Castle Square Bldg. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    406 F.2d 188 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 10 times

    No. 7150. January 24, 1969. Edwin Sidman, Boston, Mass., with whom Howard Rubin and Guterman, Horvitz Rubin, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Warren M. Davison, Attorney, Washingon, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Ian D. Lanoff, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Frederick W. Roche, Burton Peltz, and Roche, Carens DeGiacomo, Boston, Mass., on brief for Associated

  6. Kerfoot v. Kessener

    227 Ind. 58 (Ind. 1949)   Cited 29 times
    Observing that “the preliminary recitals of the contract may be of some value, but they are not contractual, and can not be permitted to control the express provisions of the contract which are contractual in nature”

  7. Ohio Valley Carpenters Dist. C., v. N.L.R.B

    339 F.2d 142 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 15629. November 19, 1964. Robert A. Wilson, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioners. George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Sitting by designation from the District of Columbia Circuit. PRETTYMAN,

  8. National Woodwork Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.2d 594 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 14904, 14988, 15064. November 17, 1965. Rehearings Denied January 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa., for Metropolitan Dist. Council etc. Charles B. Mahin, Chicago, Ill., for National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and SCHNACKENBERG and KNOCH, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, National Woodwork Manufacturers Association, on

  9. National Labor Relations Boad v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam

    285 F.2d 642 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 12 times
    In Enterprise the owner awarded to the contractor a general piping contract under which the contractor was obliged to fabricate and install such piping as the owner would provide for the project.

  10. Lambertz v. Builders, Inc.

    331 P.2d 559 (Kan. 1958)   Cited 10 times

    No. 41,062 Opinion filed November 8, 1958. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT CONTRACTS — Quantum Meruit — Modification — Verdict and Findings — Commissions. The record in an action in quantum meruit to recover the reasonable value of plaintiff's services, in the form of commissions based upon the leasing of space in commercial buildings owned and developed by the defendants, as more fully set forth in the opinion, pursuant to a written contract of employment providing for an annual salary, later modified by