Local 459, Int'l Union of Electrical, Radio, Etc.

23 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
366 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 186 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach
228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 67 times
In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".
Superior Derrick Corporation v. N.L.R.B
273 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1960) Cited 37 times
Nos. 17619, 17512. January 21, 1960. C. Paul Barker, Dodd, Hirsch, Barker Meunier, New Orleans, La., Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel, for Seafarers' International Union of North America, and others. Bernard Marcus, Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, New Orleans, La., Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for Superior Derrick Corp. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Norton
Retail Fruit Veg. Clerks U. v. N.L.R.B
249 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. 1957) Cited 39 times
No. 15298. November 8, 1957. Carroll, Davis, Burdick, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane Beeson, Norton J. Come, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BONE and FEE, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. Petitioners bring the instant proceeding to this Court for review and seek an order setting aside an order of the National
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Assoc. Musicians
226 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 39 times
No. 35, Docket 23550. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided November 3, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. David I. Ashe, New York City (Ashe Rifkin, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. CLARK,
Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.
75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948) Cited 51 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C
191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951) Cited 44 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating § 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."
Sales Drivers, Etc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
229 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1955) Cited 24 times
Noting that "the fact of concerted activity at a common situs where one not common was available" does not itself establish a secondary boycott violation
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Local 459, Int'l Union of Electrical, Radio, Etc.

23 Cited authorities

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

Noting that "the fact of concerted activity at a common situs where one not common was available" does not itself establish a secondary boycott violation

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"